Analysis: The Unusual Chakwera-Zamba, MCP Alliance in the Chikangawa Crash Inquiry
The recent appointment of a commission to investigate the Chikangawa plane crash has raised eyebrows, mainly due to the apparent connections of its members to President Lazarus Chakwera and the Malawi Congress Party (MCP).
The commission’s composition has sparked concerns over impartiality, prompting questions about potential bias in its findings.
An Unusual Composition
The commission’s makeup has raised suspicions, with twelve of its members linked directly to President Chakwera, SPC Zamba, or the MCP. This alignment suggests the commission might not be an independent body but rather an extension of political interests, potentially designed to control the narrative around this tragic incident. By appointing trusted supporters, Chakwera may aim to steer the inquiry’s outcome, possibly absolving his administration of responsibility.
Historical Context and Precedent
Malawian governance traditionally supports open inquiries into deaths and accidents, fostering transparency and public trust. However, the shift toward secrecy in this case is unprecedented, casting doubt on what may be hidden. Past commissions that lacked transparency have often faced public skepticism, eroding their credibility and legitimacy.
Profiles of Potential Bias
Several commission members appear to exhibit political favoritism:
1. Monsignor Boniface Thawale – Once a vocal anti-DPP cleric, Thawale’s ties to Chakwera and perceived manipulation of the Public Affairs Committee (PAC) suggest potential bias. His role in a previous inquiry, which failed to clarify Martha Chizuma’s arrest, further questions his objectivity.
2. Mary Nkosi – A former banker and active MCP member, Nkosi’s appointments by Chakwera cast doubt on her impartiality. Her close ties to the President could imply party loyalty over a dedication to truth.
3. Nimia Kambili Mzembe and Mirriam Wemba – Both have benefited from Chakwera’s appointments, indicating they may be reluctant to challenge the administration’s preferred narrative.
4. Esther Chioko – Her history of covering up allegations against SPC Zamba raises concerns about her commitment to accountability in this inquiry.
5. Dr. Sunduzwayo Madise – Given his close association with Chakwera and political patronage, Madise may prioritize protecting the President’s reputation over an unbiased investigation.
6. Emma Kaliya and Inkosi Makwangwala – Both have shown clear allegiance to the administration, contributing to perceptions that the commission is more partisan than neutral.
The Implications of Partiality
A biased commission carries significant risks. An inquiry seen as politically manipulated could erode public trust in the government, especially as many Malawians face economic challenges and discontent with leadership. Perceived partiality might incite public outcry, calls for accountability, and even civil unrest. Moreover, a slanted investigation may fail to uncover the facts, leading to missed lessons that could prevent future incidents.
Conclusion: A Call for Transparency
The Chikangawa plane crash commission’s composition and its secrecy have prompted concerns about potential political manipulation. With numerous members connected to the President and the MCP, the commission risks being seen as an instrument of political expediency rather than a genuine effort for accountability.
For a credible and trustworthy inquiry, the commission must prioritize transparency and independence. Open hearings and engagement with civil society organizations could provide essential oversight. Only through a commitment to truth can the commission genuinely serve Malawians and uphold justice. Without such measures, it risks being remembered as a tool of political maneuvering rather than an unbiased quest for accountability.
